True Colours

Today's Flâneur

Today’s Flâneur

There he goes, crossing the intersection of Barton Street East and Sherman Avenue North; a controversial area. Who is he, and why is he there? Seeing this lone ambulatory brought an old discussion to mind, and I think about it every time I look at this picture.

We’ve gone through a period in which nearly everyone and their uncle have had a taste of shooting contemporary street photography (SP). I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, it will take time before all of those who have jumped onto the fad aspects of the genre become bored or disillusioned with it, and leave the truly dedicated behind to carry it on. I think the climax may have been back in 2012. Now we are beginning to see exactly who is genuinely interested in the art as practitioners, viewers, collectors or any combination thereof. For me, this is an exciting time.

During the years of resurgence, if I may say that, many journals, essays, books, magazines, blogs and online forums have come about in which people have connected flâneurism with street photography. It’s really nothing new. Geniuses like Susan Sontag have been doing it since at least the early 1970’s. Although we have tried our best to explain the phenomenon, once in a while someone still asks me just what a flâneur is especially as artists like me are willing to refer to ourselves as flâneurs.

It truly is something difficult to explain in just a few words while getting right to the heart of it. I don’t think that there is even an official dictionary definition for a flâneur. We’re forced to recall and cite whatever broad or limited knowledge we have of Charles Baudelaire and Walter Benjamin.

As the word flâneur is obviously of French origin; European French that is, there are English translations of it meaning either “stroller” or worse a disrespectul “soliciter”.

I’ve lived my entire life in predominantly Anglophone parts of Canada (Ontario and BC), so in my youth I learned French as a second language but never became fluent due to not having anyone to continue speaking it with. I spent three years learning German and got much further with it but still didn’t achieve fluency for the same reason.

Manitoba has a fairly large Francophone population but Quebec, “La belle province”, is true French Canada.

I recall a highschool French teacher explaining to our class years ago that there are some in Quebec who consider the term flâneur to be an insult whereas it might not be taken that way in much of France. French Canadians allegedly consider a flâneur to be a person who is pompous and may only pretend to care about others. This notion is the opposite of what the the term was originally supposed to mean.

I don’t think Beaudelaire of 19th century France forsaw the fuss he starting when he first coined the term to represent someone who did care about all others of society, and was curious about his or her community that they would habitually wander about observing circumstances and contemplating ways of improving life. It’s presumed that in 19th century France, the only people that had the time to stroll around cities this way would be the wealthy. This is the reason why even Beaudelaire’s description of a flâneur is someone of affluence or perceived social importance. A “gentleman” is the English term usually associated with Beaudelaire’s description; a term that used to be heavily associated with snobby British aristocracy.

It is cynicism why there may be some in modern day Quebec who would doubt that a wealthy person could sincerely care about other’s circumstances but their own. That cyicism is also associated with centuries old bigotry between Anglophone and Francophone Canadians – dating back to the beginnings of Canada when the British and the French (from France that is) were often at each other’s throats while competing for dominance of this land (the British won); hence the unwillingness of Francophone Canadians, who are flâneurs, to call themselves flâneurs.

Really, a flâneur does not have to be wealthy, English, Anglophone, a career politician or part of any social elite. He or she just has to be curious about the realities of a community (not much watered down), and want to find adequate ways to celebrate or improve it. It’s an interesting and understandably very controversial aspect of idealism.

As for the photographic connection, well, I believe that the true diehards who will not OD on SP will end up being the unsung flâneurs of their communities. When you actually consider the history of SP since the late 1800’s, isn’t that how it has always been?


19 thoughts on “True Colours

      • Wow! Totally agree w the watermark for protection. I might opt for a white or black WM on the B&W shots, and keep the red for the color shots. I used a WM for awhile as well, and often think of going back. Thanks for all the visits and comments on my page. Following u now 😉

      • I agree with you Allan. I also watermark my photos, because I’ve had photos (and actually full posts) stolen. It’s still possible to steal photos from my blog, but now they’ll have to go through the trouble to remove the watermark first. That minor obstacle might be enough for them to leave my photos alone…

      • As the above link tells, what happened to you and Rommel are the prime reasons why I began watermarking in exactly the way I do. I’m still disgusted with what happened.

        Yes, make them work for it. Double time!

    • Yes, his folded behind his back definitely caught my eye and made an impression. He certainly looks the part; all distinguished with his little old cap, his done up trenchcoat, slacks, leather shoes and casual posture.

  1. Interesting write-up, Allan. I think I would characterize myself as a flâneur. Great image by the way. I love the contrast, both the visual and the conceptual contrast between the man and the car.

  2. Thank you for imparting your knowledge, Allan. Widely interesting. I think nowadays people look more and see more, but not contemplate on what’s going on. I would say I don’t see a lot of flaneur nowadays.

    • Thank you Paula, but to my knowledge no one has done so yet. It’s Rommel and Cardinal Guzman who have been robbed. It’s largely because of them why I started watermarking to make it much more difficult (not impossible) for thieves to rip me off. So far so good but I must remain vigilant.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: