Project Outline / Sub-Hierarchical

A tugboat moored at a Hamilton harbourfront pier with the massive James N. Allan Skyway Bridge looming in the distance.

I’ll photograph almost anything but I have always been most interested in photojournalism and street photography, and I’ve done the latter for years without ever having any real focus in the genre. For the longest while, I was interested in shooting anything within an indoor or outdoor urban setting; any city, anywhere. I still am. I never expected my photographic art interests; however, to naturally gravitate to mainly focusing on the city of Hamilton as it has.

I’ve met many who have lived in this city their entire lives, and express that they don’t really care what happens to this town. They’re just as adaptable anywhere, and if they had to live elsewhere they wouldn’t just adapt to that location, they’d actually forget about this place. I’m sure that I could adapt to living somewhere else too but I know from personal experience that I could never forget Hamilton. I lived in Hamilton in the 70’s, lived in north-central British Columbia throughout the 80’s, and then returned to Hamilton. I actually do care about what goes on here.

So, instead of assuming that I know so much about “The Hammer”, as the city is nicknamed, I’m on a quest for knowledge. I want to discover what I really don’t know, and understand what really makes this town what it is. Hopefully, I’ll even figure out what I could do to make it better.

A warm hug is well received on the steps of Jackson Square.

The first phase involved studying and photographing the city generally between 2000 and 2009. In the late 90’s, people sounded so enthusiastic and optimistic about the world when they would refer to the incoming “New Millennium”. So I became curious as to how Hamilton endured during the first ten years of this presumed time of wonder. By the end of 2009, I ended up with a webpage that was too long and busy and probably a huge waste of bandwidth. I truncated it, moved it from the main Modes of Flight website to the main MOF blog, and now to this blog page.

In spite of all that time and effort devoted that decade was actually a quick and dirty approach to urban photography of Hamilton overall; an introduction to the city, and me finding my way through street photography. Many of the pictures I made were more representational of individual landscape, architectural, landmark and documentary photography. They were also quite common. In looking at the photography of other local photographers, I found that they took pictures of many of the same things I did, and in the same way. This did not sit well with me. I realized that although I convinced myself that I was making unique images, I truly had failed to push myself as an artist to capture images that no one else would have thought to. It became necessary to do better, as I know I am quite capable of.

I also don’t feel as though I did enough to showcase this much misunderstood city. This place is deeply loved by probably half of its inhabitants while condemned by the other portion. Some non-residents also throw stones at it but most of them, really, seem to ignore this city. It doesn’t exist for them.

I’d like to show everybody just how interesting the City of Hamilton actually is, and how much more potential there exists. I don’t intend to do it in any typical promotion of tourism and business sort of way either. If these are the inadvertent results, fantastic but my main intent is to record Hamilton’s mundane to controversial aspects because many, not all, of these dissenting qualities give this city its wonderful character. At least in my mind they do. I am very much motivated by cultural diversity and the happenstances that most people usually take for granted.

Some of the many faces and cultures you could see on any given day in “the Hammer”.

Such images may have the potential to inspire others with brilliant ideas for making positive change where the change is needed. Maybe then, my photographic art will serve an ambassadorial role to people who may take a first time or renewed interest in this great Canadian city.

In getting to know the city I live in, and trying to envision its future, I’ve made exploring and photographing the city of Hamilton a very personal life project. I used to call it the Steeltown Neighbourhoods Project because this was a city that was best know for it’s steel industry for nearly 100 years. I also focused on the official neighbourhoods of the city. As the health care professions have become the leading industry, the local’s continue to affectionately refer to this tough historically blue collar town by its pounding handle, and as I’m trying to use street photography, urban photography and rural photography to drive a point across (at least to myself), this is now the Hammer Home Street Photography Project.

The Current Approach

In the renewed approach, the project had three phases; one which actually began in 2007.  There continues to be the aim is to explore each official neighbourhood, sector and constituent community of the city individually, starting with those of lower (below the Niagara Escarpment) Hamilton.

Lower Hamilton has a particular significance to me because I find it so strange to hear that there are lifelong residents who say they haven’t been to the core or other lower city areas in a decade; give or take some years, out of some notion that lower Hamilton is rundown beyond hope and rife with danger. It would be so rewarding to me if I could show citizens and outsiders the differences that I see between areas of the same city that aren’t necessarily indications of degradation.

To help get a feel of a neighbourhood and why it may have the character it does today, I will briefly research each area’s history for comparison with its present, and depict each neighbourhood through contemporary urban images. Originally, these were going to be ten-image photo essays, later on I switched to twenty. I’ve now suspended all such limitations indefinitely.

He paces up and down the street, silently screaming about the world’s pain.

This time, the images must be of greater fine art quality; less documentary-style and more about capturing mundane or unusual moments which is typical of refined street photography. I hope that the dominance, weakness similarity or differences of moments and moods intuitively captured by each photo in a series will automatically reveal the prevailing characteristic(s) of each area. In detail, images must:

  • Be of the respective area profiled (establishing both a theme; the respective area, and ensuring authenticity of the images);
  • Be indicative that the area being profiled is a Hamilton area, in its contemporary state, through obvious or unobvious means (a means of ensuring authenticity of respective themes, and a necessary guideline bordering on being an absolute rule of thematic street photography, and extremely challenging as some images may not readily typify a Hamilton neighbourhood and life in it);
  • Attempt to capture a typical or atypical moment in the area being profiled. It could illustrate the true character of the area and/or the entire city (capturing moments is a necessary general guideline bordering on being an absolute rule of street photography);
  • Show the benign and/or controversial aspects of the area being profiled, not necessarily the good and/or bad (fair motives and challenges for genuine urban photography that are also sources of risk);
  • Show the true character of an area and people living there (this should inadvertently illustrate the general differences and similarities between different areas, i.e., physical, social, economic and political living conditions);
  • Be able to not just show the character of an area and its people but sometimes also other aspects of life and society (this may help an observer, who absolutely cannot identify with Hamilton under any circumstances, still be able to relate to a subject or concept illustrated in an image or interpret a scene however they wish);
  • Be candid (an unavoidable characteristic of genuine urban photography that is also a risk, and makes street images so interesting);
  • Seldom yield to the traditions of portraiture (shoot the sides and backs of people more than the face, and even shoot only parts of their anatomies);
  • Occasionally show repetition or sequences of objects or people or convey a rhythm within a single image (patterns are typically valuable in photography and can convey strong mechanical or organic characteristics, a chronology or sense of time);
  • Occasionally be impressionist (deliberately make shaken, blurred, grainy, underexposed, overexposed, poorly lit, heavily shadowed and silhouetted, and oddly angled images);
  • Be in dark, almost chiaroscuro, black and white (to convey a strong psychological, social, emotional, spiritual and possibly political impact, eliminate the distraction of colour but occasionally break the rule of so-called “pure” impressionism which pushes to avoid the use of black);
  • Be carefully post-processed to ensure the same black and white style in each photo or each area series for the entire collection (this can also establish a distinct personal image style that may be readily recognizable by observers);
  • Utilize colour in a restrictive manner (establish a collection of  the photo essays about each area that will showcase the colourfulness of an area);
  • Reflect the MOF tagline of inspiring adventure (without appearing to be travel/tourism photography);
  • Inspire observers to take an interest in the neighbourhood being profiled (regardless of positive or negative traits illustrated, introduced, assumed or already known);
  • Be unique; not appearing to be like any other image already seen of the area being profiled (to challenge myself to seldom make the obvious clichéd photograph);
  • Not indicate that they’ve been made while adhering to the philosophy of “no rules street photography”—as beautiful as the philosophy is initially (as this concept is increasingly and inadvertently being practiced as a rule by urban photographers, it too has inevitably become a street photography rule that should be broken whenever a photographer feels necessary);
  • Salute the incredible genre of street photography and all of its subgenres (deserved homage to an art that inspires me every day in a positive way);
  • Pay tribute to urban photography masters like Brassaï and Henri Cartier-Bresson who have inspired me (such pioneers are actually responsible for creating this profoundly intelligent means of visually communicating the multifaceted aspects of the human condition);
  • Inspire observers artistically (a challenge for both me and potential viewers—especially those who don’t see themselves as artistically inclined or are in a habit of overlooking aesthetics); and
  • Show the world how this city looks through my eyes.

    A severely intoxicated man is rousted from his sidewalk slumber.

To also help me get a sense of each area in their modern states, and to try to anticipate their futures, I hope to find people from each area who are willing to share their positive and negative experiences and most frank opinions of living in their respective areas. I’m even interested in their opinions of other Hamilton areas, and the city overall.

The more diverse their backgrounds, the better; they could have lived in their areas for a short time, or all their life. They could be wealthy or unemployed and on welfare, modest or a contemptible snob, well-educated or not at all, shy or blatantly exhibitionist, the epitome of peak health or terminally ill, young or old, puritanical or unapologetically crack-addicted, of any race, any ethnicity, any religious faith or atheist, any political ideology or sexual orientation.

It will be interesting to see just what Hamiltonians, if any, come forward. They have the power to show who they really are, and just what this city is made of.

Although telling the story of a city is probably best attempted through photojournalism, I have chosen this somewhat more creative approach by applying related street photography genres, which are in fact related to photojournalism. It’s different, less preachy for those who find photojournalism too abrasive and; after all, the related street photography genres are about the “average person” and the environment in which they work live and play. These are people and an environment that I like to think I am personally somewhat familiar with. I should make extra effort to understand them more.

Laste Kraze

Laste Kraze

The Mountain

In assessing the scope of this project and the potential volume of work to be produced as time goes by; once I had lifted my own previously held restrictions on the number of photos to be made, I considered that the project required being spread across three separate blogs. There was to be one for Lower Hamilton, one for Hamilton Mountain and one for Rural Hamilton.

It is well established that the city of Hamilton’s is divided socially as a result of the geography and economics that exists. This is a major city that is literally sheared in half by the steep Niagara Escarpment that averages 100m (330ft) in height across the municipality. To the north of the escarpment are the lower “Head of the Lake” areas that have very old and fairly-well documented histories that citizens, like me, have begun to slowly acquaint themselves with. To the south are the contemporary suburbs that continue to expand into the city’s outer area. These areas above the escarpment are what all Hamiltonian’s simply refer to as “the mountain”.

Typically, the older parts of major cities anywhere in the world become actual or perceived neglected inner cities where once held opulent suburbs and business districts have become the epitomes of urban degradation. To some degree, Hamilton has not gone unscathed from this urban planning phenomenon. Despite successful semi-activist and part political efforts to maintain the livability of Lower Hamilton’s urban areas in recent years, decades of aggressive growth above the escarpment has resulted in noticeably more modern living conditions in the southern portion with the burgeoning notion there that Lower Hamilton has become a den of iniquity to be avoided. There are now citizens in the newer suburban and even rural areas above the escarpment who have expressed to local media that they haven’t ventured into the downtown areas in at least a decade. Some residents below the escarpment express bewilderment over the new suburban concern, view those of mountain suburbia as a bunch of contemptible snobs, and counter the snotty attitude by refusing to travel to the mountain areas.

These are all citizens of the same city having such vehement disdain for each other. Being that Hamilton is a somewhat maligned city by others across Canada as “the stinkin’ steeltown”, one might hope that the residents would prefer to band together in an effort to make the city appear strong, unified and adequately advancing. After all, this city and its century old steel industry are in fact highly important factors in the early economic growth of the entire country of Canada.

There is a challenge in photographing the mountain due to an expectation of limited history that I can research about each area above the Niagara Escarpment, and the expectation of a limited amount of varying circumstances with ideal aesthetics that I can find to make images that will have impact on viewers. I aim to:

  • Examine the history and transformation of farmlands and wilderness above the escarpment into modern suburbia (including the rate of transformation);
  • Illustrate the circumstances of urban and suburban expansion into the city’s periphery (there is a well-established conflict over the issue of urban sprawl that is directly connected to the areas above the escarpment);
  • Illustrate the differences, similarities and social attitudes between the suburbs above the escarpment and the urban living areas below; and
  • Discover diverse cultures and subcultures that I and perhaps many others are not aware of (not to criticize or hold to ridicule but to learn about and try to understand).

    Saddles Ready

    Saddles Ready

Rural Hamilton

In my efforts to ensure coverage of the rustic periphery of the city, I aim to:

  • Use rural photography (a sister genre of street photography);
  • Fully promote the bucolic parts of the city’s constituent communities (they are beautiful and uncelebrated even though some of the areas may want to keep it that way);
  • Be careful to avoid limiting the phase to a pastoral art theme (attempt to investigate and show the contentious aspects of local rural life);
  • Illustrate any effort of the areas to maintain independent identities (independent from the urban or suburban areas or even each other);
  • Illustrate the circumstances of urban and suburban life encroaching on the rural experiences of the areas;
  • Illustrate how the rural areas are inevitably dependent on urban or suburban domains; and
  • Discover diverse cultures and subcultures that I and perhaps many others are not aware of (not to criticize of hold to ridicule but to learn about and try to understand).

In spreading the project over three blogs, I did suspect that there would be less popularity with the depictions of life on the mountain in comparison to that of below the escarpment. As much as many citizens criticize the conditions and residents of Lower Hamilton, I continue to hear people from both areas say that the suburban escarpment is “boring”. That said, I expected even less interest in the goings on and images or rural living. Sure enough, by late 2013 all three blogs were merged here. Time will tell just how much more this project will evolve.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: